Disney & Universal Sue Midjourney: The AI Copyright Clash That Could Change Everything
On June 11, 2025, Hollywood titans Disney and Universal launched a 110‑page federal lawsuit branding Midjourney a “bottomless pit of plagiarism” — and demanding up to $150,000 per image
Apr 23, 2025
Shann Ng
Corporate Lawyer
Disney and Universal Sue Midjourney: The Landmark AI Copyright Battle Explained
On June 11, 2025, entertainment giants Disney and Universal filed a groundbreaking lawsuit against Midjourney, one of the most prominent generative AI platforms. This lawsuit, described as potentially transformative for the creative and technology industries, marks the first significant Hollywood-led legal challenge against an AI-driven company.
What Triggered the Lawsuit?
Disney and Universal accused Midjourney, famed for its AI image-generating capabilities, of deliberately infringing their copyrighted characters, including Elsa from Frozen, Yoda from Star Wars, Iron Man, Shrek, and the Minions. The studios claim Midjourney’s outputs replicate their intellectual properties closely enough to be considered unauthorized reproductions.
Core Allegations and Financial Stakes
The studios describe Midjourney’s practices as “calculated and willful infringement,” demanding damages of up to $150,000 per infringed image or equivalent to Midjourney’s total profits derived from the infringement. With Midjourney generating over $300 million in revenue in 2024 alone, the financial stakes in this lawsuit are enormous.
Midjourney’s New Feature Adds Fuel to the Fire
A significant concern raised in the lawsuit revolves around Midjourney’s recent expansion into AI-generated video content through its "V1" feature. This tool can produce short videos prominently featuring copyrighted characters in various scenarios, intensifying fears of widespread infringement.
Legal Precedent and Future Impact
This landmark legal action could establish significant precedent on whether AI-generated content constitutes "transformative fair use" or outright infringement. A decision favoring the studios could compel AI platforms to adopt stricter licensing models or significantly limit their use of copyrighted training data.
What's at Stake for AI Creators and Users?
Legal Clarity: A ruling could define the limits and capabilities of AI-driven creativity.
Industry Impact: Potential mandatory licensing agreements could reshape AI content generation.
Creators’ Rights: A win for Hollywood could strengthen protection for original works, influencing AI development.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Can Midjourney claim fair use?
A: Midjourney might argue that its creations are transformative, offering new interpretations rather than direct copies.
Q: What exactly counts as copyright infringement in AI-generated content?
A: Typically, infringement occurs if AI outputs are substantially similar or derived directly from copyrighted works without sufficient transformation.
Q: How much compensation can Disney and Universal realistically win?
A: They could potentially secure damages up to $150,000 per infringement or Midjourney’s total profits linked to infringing activities.
Join the Conversation
This case might fundamentally redefine how we use AI creatively. What’s your take—should AI-generated content be more strictly regulated, or is this an overreach?
Stay updated on this pivotal case. Subscribe below for the latest developments delivered directly to your inbox.
Related news on this landmark lawsuit
